No sooner do I start reading Russian fantasy author Sergei
Lukyanenko’s Night Watch than I
read that he forbids translation of his novels into Ukrainian because he
believes Ukraine should belong to Russia. With Putin having just invaded
Ukraine and thousands dying in the conflict (explainer), this leaves a bad taste in my
mouth and raises a question: What to do when artists have disagreeable views? Do you keep
enjoying their work or do you turn away?
I touched on this before in a post on science fiction author
Orson Scott Card’s opposition to gay marriage. The world is full of people
uncomfortable with LGBT lifestyles, but an acquaintance’s opinion voiced in
the office or at a backyard barbecue is one thing and a public figure spreading hate and spearheading a
campaign to limit civil rights is another. When you learn that Orson Scott Card
is a homophobe and a paranoid nut in politics, do you go see the movie
adaptation of his brilliant novel Ender’s
Game?
I’ve been on a Brigitte Bardot kick. First I watched And God Created Woman (1956), directed
by Roger Vadim and featuring Bardot as a vivacious young woman trapped in a
dull marriage. Then there was Contempt,
Jean-Luc Godard’s 1963 masterpiece about a marriage that falls apart. Bardot
simmers and sizzles, flounces and fumes, pouts and purrs, and is, in everything
she does, enchanting.
Then I read the French courts keep fining her for hate speech against Muslims.
One might ask what Card’s or Bardot’s political stances have
to do with their art, and the answer is perhaps very little. But then again it could be a lot.
This question has long surrounded Richard Wagner. His
works revolutionized opera to the extent that for a long time composers and critics
felt he had maxed out the art form, that nothing else significant could be done
with it. Wagner’s music goes beyond
beautiful to sublime, and yet his anti-Semitism is well known. It was a sticking
point with some in his day and even now musicians and philosophers continue to debate how much his views permeate his music.
When the connection between opinion and art isn’t clear,
surely the decision of how to react is subjective. While I may not hesitate to
voice my views on issues such as the Israel-Palestine conflict (recent post), I have no
interest in telling you that since Seth Rogen signed his name to a letter in support of Israel during its recent invasion of Gaza that you shouldn’t laugh
at his jokes in movies. I also have no interest in telling others what they can
and cannot say.
But whether I lend my support to their views is another
matter.
For my part, I swore off anything to do with Orson Scott
Card, but when it comes to Bardot, I have already ordered more films from
Amazon. Bardot’s films have nothing to do with her opinions and they all came
out decades before the issues that spark her objectionable views were pressing.
She is now an elderly woman in a proud country where many people are dealing with
change (globalization, economic uncertainty, increased immigration and radical
jihadism) the way people so often do--which is to say poorly.
So she gets a pass.
I’m still not sure about Lukyanenko. So far, Night Watch hasn’t had much going
for it in style, character or vision. The series is based on the premise of two
forces of Others--vampires, werewolves, magicians and so forth
aligned with either Good or Evil--who have entered into a treaty according to
which each polices the other to preserve a balance between Light and Darkness.
As Putin solidifies his iron rule, enforces backwards social values, expands
Russia’s territory, and imprisons his political opponents, is it relevant that
Lukyanenko has taken what is usually a subversive genre and made it about law
and order?
I’d like to give the book more of a chance before I make up my mind.
When the connection between artists' views and their art
is tenuous, I can understand why someone else might decide other than I do, and
I have no problem with that. Healthy discussion and debate is always desirable,
but if others will respectfully leave me to my decision, I’ll leave them to
theirs.
No comments:
Post a Comment